 | | |
Welcome to the xenoMED, an online Medical Community where Academically sound, Professionally conscious and Socially responsible Medical Students, Doctors & Health Professionals interact with each other globally.
Medicine is the only profession that incessantly tries to destroy its own existence. Howsoever you may be associated with basic and/or clinical medicine - student or professor, physician or surgeon, undergraduate or postgraduate - this is your place to share your knowledge, and learn more. Just get the message across!
You are currently viewing our communiy as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, Join Our Medical Cummunity Today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
| | Journal Club Take part in the discussion of an article published in the various Medical Journal, Journal club info and more... | Altitude paper by Prof Buddha
Published by Mati
23-03-2006
| | Altitude paper by Prof Buddha Hi friends,
Here is the latest trial in altitude sickness by one of the leaders in Mountain Medicine around the world, Prof Buddha:
the abstract goes..... Acetazolamide 125 mg BD Is Not Significantly Different from 375 mg BD in the Prevention of Acute Mountain Sickness: The Prophylactic Acetazolamide Dosage Comparison for Efficacy (PACE) Trial.
Basnyat B, Gertsch JH, Holck PS, Johnson EW, Luks AM, Donham BP, Fleischman RJ, Gowder DW, Hawksworth JS, Jensen BT, Kleiman RJ, Loveridge AH, Lundeen EB, Newman SL, Noboa JA, Miegs DP, O'beirne KA, Philpot KB, Schultz MN, Valente MC, Wiebers MR, Swenson ER. Himalayan Rescue Association and Nepal International Clinic, Kathmandu, Nepal. Quote: |
Acetazolamide 125 mg BD is not significantly different from 375 mg BD in the prevention of acute mountain sickness: the prophylactic acetazolamide dosage comparison for efficacy (PACE) trial. High Alt. Med. & Biol. 7(17-27), 2006.- 750 mg per day of acetazolamide in the prevention of acute mountain sickness (AMS), as recommended in the meta-analysis published in 2000 in the British Medical Journal, may be excessive and is controversial. To determine if the efficacy of low-dose acetazolamide 125 mg bd (250 mg), as currently used in the Himalayas, is significantly different from 375 mg bd (750 mg) of acetazolamide in the prevention of AMS, we designed a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The participants were sampled from a diverse population of (non-Nepali) trekkers at Namche Bazaar (3440 m) in Nepal on the Everest trekking route as they ascended to study midpoints (4280 m/4358 m) and the endpoint, Lobuje (4928 m), where data were collected. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 375 mg bd of acetazolamide (82 participants), 125 mg bd of acetazolamide (74 participants), or a placebo (66 participants), beginning at 3440 m for up to 6 days as they ascended to 4928 m. The results revealed that composite AMS incidence for 125 mg bd was similar to the incidence for 375 mg bd (24% vs. 21%, 95% confidence interval, -12.6%, 19.8%), in contrast to significantly greater AMS (51%) observed in the placebo group (95% confidence interval for differences: 8%, 46%; 12%, 49% for low and high comparisons, respectively). Both doses of acetazolamide improved oxygenation equally (82.9% for 250 mg daily and 82.8% for 750 mg daily), while placebo endpoint oxygen saturation was significantly less at 80.7% (95% confidence interval for differences: 0.5%, 3.9% and 0.4%, 3.7% for low and high com-parisons, respectively). There was also more paresthesia in the 375-mg bd group (p < 0.02). We conclude that 125 mg bd of acetazolamide is not significantly different from 375 mg bd in the prevention of AMS; 125 mg bd should be considered the preferred dosage when indicated for persons ascending to altitudes above 2500 m.
|
It was published in
High Alt Med Biol. 2006 Spring;7(1):17-27
Best wishes,
mati | | | | | The Following User Says Thank You to Mati For This Useful Post: | | | Review Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new reviews You may not post comments You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Similar Threads | | Review | Review Starter | Category | Comments | Last Post | | Our New Buddha | Dev | General Talks | 36 | 06-01-2006 04:03 PM | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com | Hosted and Maintained by: | |  | |